Comments for recluze

Comment on Web Fax for Asterisk by lululemon

lululemon — Mon, 20 May 2013 03:35:56 +0000

Read more about these Ayurvedic tips for staying beautiful while flying by clicking here

Comment on Web services using Apache Tomcat and Eclipse by blogspot.co.uk

blogspot.co.uk — Sat, 11 May 2013 04:23:19 +0000

Thanks for the marvelous posting! I seriously enjoyed
reading it, you may be a great author. I will ensure that I bookmark your blog
and definitely will come back sometime soon. I want to
encourage continue your great job, have a nice afternoon!

Comment on Web Fax for Asterisk by cold calling law

cold calling law — Thu, 02 May 2013 06:00:57 +0000

I’ve been exploring for a bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts in this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this site. Reading this info So i’m glad to
convey that I have an incredibly just right uncanny feeling I found out exactly what
I needed. I most without a doubt will make sure to do not omit this
website and provides it a glance on a relentless basis.

Comment on Web services using Apache Tomcat and Eclipse by Nuhuqixepoj.sosblogs.Com

Nuhuqixepoj.sosblogs.Com — Thu, 02 May 2013 01:43:28 +0000

It’s truly a nice and helpful piece of info. I am satisfied that you shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

Comment on A Basic Naive Bayes classifier in Matlab by doriszhang

doriszhang — Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:17:54 +0000

This one is correct:

pxSF = (pxS * pS ) / (pxS * pS + pxE * pE)
pxEF = (pxE * pE ) / (pxS * pS + pxE * pE)

Comment on Web Fax for Asterisk by ethomas

ethomas — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:19:40 +0000

Dear Sirs,

I am able to send out the fax call, I confirmed by dial my cell that the dialing out is working. However while trying to send a fax to a fax machine I am getting this error:

[2013-04-16 17:57:12] NOTICE[25192]: pbx_spool.c:353 attempt_thread: Call failed to go through, reason (3) Remote end Ringing
[2013-04-16 17:57:12] NOTICE[25192]: pbx_spool.c:356 attempt_thread: Queued call to Local/1XXXXXXXXXX@outbound-allroutes expired without completion after 1 attempt

I am getting the impression that the app is not detecting the fax machine on the PSTN network.

Your help would be greatly appreciated. I am using FreePBX 2.10 / Asterisk 1.8.12 / 1 free fax license from Digium

Comment on ProFTPD with SFTP, MySQL and Monthly Usage Reports by JDS

JDS — Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:36:39 +0000

Hm, looks like there is a date listed for this article. Sorry about that!

Comment on A Basic Naive Bayes classifier in Matlab by Masud

Masud — Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:49:33 +0000

Please correct it
pxEF = (pxE * pS ) / (pxS + pxE)
to
pxEF = (pxE * pE ) / (pxS + pxE)

Comment on Confusion amongst Zaid Hamid Fans by Nauman

Nauman — Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:27:29 +0000

Thanks for the comments (even though I can’t put my finger on which Kashif you are).

A few comments about your questions:

1. The references about Yousuf Kazzab are not a point of discussion here so aren’t provided. (The transcript of his trial is public record and the audios are available for anyone to go seek.)

2. The rules of “tauba” you have mentioned are indeed true for any “murtad”. However, they do not apply to someone who claims that he is a muslim but has ‘aqaid opposed to islam. The reason that tauba doesn’t apply there is that such a person already declares himself to be a muslim — he only applies different semantics/meaning to the word thus suggesting that the definition given by Prophet Muhammad (salallaho alaihe wasallam) is, nauzubillah, wrong). Such a person is called Zindeeq and acceptance of his tauba as far as the rules of this world are concerned is not agreed upon. If, a person, does indeed changes his faith back, he will get his reward in the hereafter but here, he will be dealt with as a zindeeq. The reason is quite clear if you think about it: no one can be allowed to deform the meaning of Islam and then declare himself a muslim according to his own definition. The qadiyanis do the same thing when they say “Lailaha illallah muhammad ur rasoolullah”. They consider Mirza Qadiyani to be, nauzubillah, Muhammad (as is evident from their literature). The declaration hold no meaning after that thought.

3. Your comments about schizophrenia are mute since no one claimed insanity/mental illness. You can apply the same logic to ALL convicts.

Jazakallah for putting your time in understanding the issues.

Comment on Confusion amongst Zaid Hamid Fans by Kashif

Kashif — Sat, 16 Mar 2013 20:23:41 +0000

This is the first time that I am hearing the name Yusuf Kazzab. I have heard ZH’s name alot and have seen many supporters and those who denounce him. For me ZH is someone who is in love with Delhi, as he always seems to be dreaming about conquering that city for some reason. As for as Yusuf Kazzab is concerned, a quick search for him explained that Yusuf Ali claimed that he was a Prophet.
However, in your article as well as in all other links on the internet, I could not find any authentic REFERENCE to his statements in which he claimed such things. You always taught us that whenever we use/mention some line of someone, we must give a reference for it. But in this article and many others, he was quoted but no reference was made.
Also, I read that in his trial he consistently denied having said anything of that sort to desecrate the name of Muhammad(PBUH) and or Islam.
The other thing is that if there was some irrefutable evidence against him which proved that he had said those stuff, his denial and tauba would still not suffice and he deserved capital punishment?
I am saying this because I have heard, if I am not wrong, in the Hanafi School of Thought, even if someone say that he does not believe in Islam or Allah, he would be requested three days to change his views and come back to the true path of Islam. For three consecutive days, he will be confronted and requested each day to change his stance. After that if he still maintains his opinion, he would be prosecuted and the Qazi could suggest a punishment for him.
There are few questions I want to raise here, 1) if Yusuf Ali was given a chance to come back to true path of Islam? And, 2) what about Yusuf Ali’s denial? 3) Was Yusuf Ali’s psychological situation assessed by a psychiatrist? What if he was a Schizophrenic ? Because if he was, then he would not have been wrong in believing anything that he believed, heard, or seen. Those who suffer from such type of psychological disorder can show these symptoms that he showed. So the 4th question that arises then is that, do you think justice was served in this case?
Finally, he was given a death sentence and he was awaiting his fate, was his killing in jail justified in any way? Do you think it was an Islamic act and will be rewarded by Allah(swt)?

Allah(swt) says in the glorious Quran…
“…so judge between people justly, and do not follow desire that it should lead you astray from the path of Allah.”
Similarly He says,…
“Surely Allah commands you to make over trusts to those worthy of them, and that
when you judge between people, you judge with justice. Surely Allah instructs you
with what is excellent.”